Thursday, May 14, 2015

On the importance of step 3 of 4 "doing writing" in our literacy program:

The importance of writing (step 3) in Book Buddies:
Writing. In all of these programs, writing is an integral part of tutoring in reading. Writing activities provide children the opportu nity to see the relationship between reading and print. The writing process enables the child to This content downloaded on Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:24:01 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions attend to the visual details and to sort out letter sound relationships. Writing activities are closely coordinated with words from the word analysis. That is, students write sentences or brief paragraphs using sight words and decod able words they are learning. Writing provides repeated opportunities to see the structure of words, to explore the coordination of sound and symbols, and to practice expressing ideas in words. Depending on the program's focus, the content of the writing is generated by the tutor, the child, or sometimes both.”
The Reading Teacher Vol. 51, No. 7 April 1998
(Using Volunteers as Reading Tutors: Guidelines for Successful Practices Author(s): Barbara A. Wasik Reviewed work(s): Source: The Reading Teacher, Vol. 51, No. 7 (Apr., 1998), pp. 562-570 Published by: International Reading Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20201962 . Accessed: 14/05/2015 18:24) jhd

AND

 “Writing. The writing component of the Charlottesville Volunteer Tutorial is referred to as writing for sounds. We want children to learn how to segment their speech and to match letters to those segmented sounds. At the same time, we want to encourage children to use reading as a scaffold for their initial writing attempts (McGill-Franzen, Lanford, & Killian, 1994). 

Tutors are encouraged to dictate sentences from familiar texts, or children compose their own sentence(s) about the books they have read. Whenever possible, tutors guide children in writing a transformation in which the sentence varies from the original in only two or three words. For example, "In a dark, dark house, there was a dark, dark staircase" might become "In a dark, dark basement, there was a dark, dark closet." 

The tutor dictates the sentence and models the segmentation process by elongating the sounds in the words for children to match the letters to the sounds they hear. Children are encouraged to do their own elongating of sounds as needed. There is considerable evidence to suggest that the act of segmenting speech and matching letters to sounds is a rigorous exercise of phonics in and of itself (Blachman, 1992). Indeed, some researchers have used children's spellings as an indicator of phonemic aware ness (Clay, 1985; Morris, 1992). 

Research has shown that writing in invented spellings enhances children's memory of words, at least at the beginning stages (Ehri & Wilce, 1987). Spellings change as word knowledge grows, and word knowledge grows as exercise and instruction are paced to the child's zone of proximal development (Vygotsky, 1962). The children in the Charlottesville Volunteer Tutorial are encouraged to use their own knowledge of letter-sound correspondences and to produce "sound spellings" even if these are incorrect. 

Children are, however, held accountable for those features they have been taught during the word study component of the tutorial. Errors specifically related to features examined through word study are "negotiated toward correctness" (Clay, 1988). Those features not yet taught directly are allowed to stand as invented spellings.”

 ("A Community Volunteer Tutorial That Works" Author(s): Marcia Invernizzi, Connie Juel and Catherine A. Rosemary Source: The Reading Teacher, Vol. 50, No. 4 (Dec., 1996 - Jan., 1997), pp. 304-311  Published by: Wiley on behalf of the International Reading AssociationStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20201767 .)Accessed: 14/05/2015 19:38) jhd


Thursday, May 7, 2015

First Semester "I Can Read" Literacy project shows amazing success....1.27 years average vocabulary reading improvement.



Summary

Based on an existing relationship with Franklin Elementary School for help in reading (95%  free and reduced lunch, 43% illiteracy rate, 37% English learners) and the opportunity to have a Community Engaged Student Fellow, funded by California Campus Compact, Vernette Doty at UC Merced’s Office of Student Life-Civic Leadership collaborated with community partner in literacy (John Doty, Ph.D. ) to recruit and train UCM volunteer students to conduct a semester long pilot program in literacy tutoring. An initial trial of seven UCM students in November garnered a response of 25 Franklin children, so the trial was modified to focus on an increased number of tutors (23) to work one-on-one respectively with grades K-2 level children. Research has shown the greatest impact is delivered in the early “learning to read” levels of instruction, hence the K-2 level focus. Initial results indicate great success--an average reading vocabulary increase of 1.27 years (see p.7).

RESULTS:
We can celebrate major improvement…averaging 1.27 years progress in reading per child!

·       Two (2) students showed a reading vocabulary improvement of 3 years.
·       One (1) student showed a reading vocabulary improvement of 2 years.
·       Ten (10) students showed a reading vocabulary improvement of 1 year.

·       Even those (3) showing no improvement in the vocabulary level, showed a meaningful improvement in the 40-point developmental spelling assessment.

The teachers, Principal, Vice-Principal, and reading specialist were all delighted. Mentor-Tutors, children, and UCM and Partners were in awe…that there was so much progress! Children reading with confidence and smiles. Many read, out-loud, in front of people, for the first time!

32 million adults in the U.S. can't read. That's 14 percent of the population. 21 percent of adults in the U.S. read below a 5th grade level, and 19 percent of high school graduates can't read.

Details: Insights and Areas for Improvement
1.      23 K-2 students completed the semester and the assessments.
2. Pre and post tests accounted for 15.
Some students were sent to other programs following the pilot because they were “too advanced” (at    or above grade level) while many more in the school still showed great need.
 Four students were new, so no pre-test, and two students were not given the vocabulary portion of    the assessment.
 Of the original volunteer mentor-tutors,  three-quarters stayed through the entire semester
6  Selection of school children could be refined,
a.  as three out of the four “new” ones were perhaps overqualified, showing final vocabulary levels of 3rd grade, 4th, and 4th, grade respectively (no pre-test)
b.   The last new child scored only 4/40 on the spelling assessment and was not able to attempt the vocabulary assessment, lacking a complete knowledge of the alphabet and even simple words (van, pet, rug, etc).

Volunteer hours, staff, team and consulting hours included approximately
a.     23 volunteers x 3 hours per week x 12 weeks         =828 hours
b.     Staff and Intern hours?                                            =150 hours
c.      Consultant: Prep, Training, Analysis, Support       =150 hours

The K-2 book supply was not quite adequate to address needs.

“Any book that helps a child to form a habit of reading, to make reading one of his deep and continuing needs, is good for him.” –Maya Angelou

Contact Vernette Doty, Associate Director, Office of Student Life, UCMerced. (209) 228-4201